Home › HRMS › Review phrases › Collaboration
Performance review phrases

Collaboration performance review phrases and examples

Collaboration is working across roles, functions and branches toward a shared result, which is harder than pulling together inside one team. The friction shows at the boundaries: a handover dropped, information held back, a joint deadline quietly missed. These phrases reward sharing data early, keeping handovers, and looping in the affected team before a change. They flag the strong internal player who treats other departments as an obstacle. Ask partner teams for their view, and use these lines across review cycles with the specific cross-team situation named.

Exceeds expectations

Meets expectations

Needs improvement

Self-review phrases

Tips for writing this feedback

Track goals and review cycles for every employee in ZeniaHR.

See it on your own data

A 30-minute demo on a video call. We set up your departments, shifts and leave rules and show attendance, leave and payroll running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.

Book a free demoSee pricing

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between teamwork and collaboration?

Teamwork is pulling your weight and supporting shared goals within your own team, day to day. Collaboration is working across roles, functions or departments to produce something together, often where interests and timing differ. A person can be reliable inside their team yet treat other departments as an obstacle. Rate the two separately so a cross-functional gap is not hidden.

How do you review cross-department collaboration?

Look at concrete cross-team situations: information shared with partner functions, handovers kept, requests answered in time, and joint deadlines honoured. Ask the partner teams for their view, since they see responsiveness a manager may not. Name a specific case in the feedback, such as sharing data early so an audit closed, rather than a general call to collaborate more.

How do you improve collaboration between teams?

Start with a shared view of pending work, such as one tracker both teams update, so nothing falls in the gap. Agree cut-offs and handover rules that each side keeps, and loop in affected teams before a change. In reviews, credit the people who share information and keep handovers, so the behaviour spreads rather than staying with a few.