Exceeds expectations
- Cut the invoice approval from four steps to two after mapping where each one added delay.
- Standardised the messy joining checklist, so every branch now onboards the same clean way.
- Reduced repeat data-entry errors by fixing the form where people kept mis-keying the same field.
- Timed the month-end close, found the slow step, and shaved two days off it.
- Wrote the undocumented process down, so it no longer lived in one person's memory.
- Removed a duplicate check that two teams were both doing, freeing hours each week.
- Built a simple template that ended the back-and-forth over how reports should look.
- Reviewed a process after each cycle and trimmed one wasteful step at a time.
Meets expectations
- Spots wasteful steps in a routine task and suggests removing them.
- Follows the standard process and flags where it slows work down.
- Documents a task clearly so it can be repeated the same way.
- Suggests a small fix that reduces a recurring error.
- Uses a checklist or template to keep a process consistent.
- Looks for a simpler way rather than accepting extra steps.
- Measures a task before and after a change to check it helped.
Needs improvement
- Follows a wasteful process without questioning the extra steps.
- Fixes a recurring error by hand each time rather than at the source.
- Changes a process without measuring whether it actually helped.
- Leaves a task undocumented, so it is done differently each time.
- Resists a simpler method because the old way is familiar.
- Suggests improvements but does not follow through to make them stick.
- Adds steps to a process without removing any, so it grows heavier.
- Works around a broken process rather than fixing it for the team.
Self-review phrases
- I map where each step adds delay now before trying to cut a process down.
- I fixed the form where people kept mis-keying the same field, cutting repeat errors.
- I want to measure a task before and after a change to confirm it helped.
- I wrote down an undocumented process so it no longer lives in one memory.
Tips for writing this feedback
- Judge process improvement by measured results, such as fewer errors or steps removed, not by activity or tinkering.
- Value fixing errors at the source over patching each one by hand, which is the deeper improvement.
- Separate process improvement from innovation: one refines an existing way, the other introduces a new one.
- Check that a change was measured and made to stick, since an unmeasured tweak may quietly make things worse.
- Credit documentation and standardising, which spread one person's improvement across the whole team.
Track goals and review cycles for every employee in ZeniaHR.
See it on your own data
A 30-minute demo on a video call. We set up your departments, shifts and leave rules and show attendance, leave and payroll running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.
Book a free demoSee pricingFrequently asked questions
How do you review process improvement?
Review it by measured results: steps removed, errors reduced, or time saved on a routine task, not by how much someone tinkers. Look for errors fixed at the source rather than patched by hand, changes that were measured before and after, and improvements documented so they stick. The strongest sign is a wasteful process made simpler and kept that way across the team.
What is the difference between process improvement and innovation?
Process improvement refines an existing way of working: cutting steps, reducing errors, standardising and documenting. Innovation introduces something new. They overlap, but improvement is usually incremental and continuous, while innovation is a bigger step change. A person may steadily improve routines without inventing anything, which is valuable. Rate the refinement here and the new approach under innovation.
Can process improvement come from junior staff?
Often it comes from them, since they run the routine tasks and feel the waste first. A junior can spot a duplicate check, a slow step, or a form that invites errors. Encourage these observations, act on the sensible ones, and credit them in reviews. Improvement stalls where the people closest to the work do not see their suggestions taken seriously.