Org chart
The chart shows only the core employees, with operations expanded to the vendor and quality team. The manufacturing, logistics and agency partners that do much of the work sit outside the chart, linked by contracts, not reporting lines.
Levels and designations
| Level | Typical designations | Span of control |
|---|---|---|
| L1 Leadership | CEO, Founder | 4 to 6 reports |
| L2 Core heads | Core Operations Head, Product Head, Marketing Head | 2 to 5 reports |
| L3 Managers | Vendor Manager, Product Manager, Brand Manager | 2 to 6 staff |
| L4 Core staff | Partner Coordinator, Quality Auditor | no direct reports |
Approval chains
| Request | Approval chain |
|---|---|
| Leave | Partner Coordinator → Vendor Manager → HR Manager |
| Attendance correction | Quality Auditor → Vendor Manager → HR Manager |
| Overtime | Brand Manager → Marketing Head → HR Manager |
| Reimbursement | Product Manager → Product Head → Finance Manager |
| Hiring | Vendor Manager → Core Operations Head → HR Manager |
How the model works
The company keeps only what makes it distinct and buys the rest. The core holds the brand, product design, customer relationship and the money, and employs a small, senior team. Everything else, making the product, storing and shipping it, running ad campaigns, even parts of customer support, is done by outside partners chosen for their skill and cost. Core staff manage those partners rather than doing the work themselves: a vendor manager oversees the factories, a brand manager briefs the agency, a supply partner manager runs logistics contracts. Take a direct-to-consumer brand in Mumbai of 60 employees whose products are made by three factories and delivered by a courier partner, all coordinated by a lean core team.
Strengths and weaknesses
The strengths are flexibility and focus. The company stays lean and asset-light, can scale up or switch partners as demand changes, and spends its own energy only on what it does best, leaving specialist work to specialists who already have the scale and skill to do it well and cheaply.
The weaknesses are control and dependence. The core relies on partners it does not employ, so quality, timelines and secrets are harder to guarantee, and a partner that fails or leaves can hurt badly. Coordinating many partners takes real effort, and the small core must manage contracts and relationships tightly, since it cannot simply instruct partner staff the way it would its own.
- Lean, asset-light and quick to scale or switch partners
- Focus on what the company does best, with the rest outsourced
- Less control over partner quality, timelines and secrets
- Dependence on partners the core does not employ
When it fits
The network structure fits asset-light businesses, new brands and companies whose edge is design, marketing or technology rather than owning factories or fleets. It works when good partners are available and the core can manage them well through clear contracts and quality checks. It fits badly when quality or secrecy must be tightly controlled in-house, or when reliable partners simply do not exist for the work. Many companies use a partial network: they employ their core and a few critical functions, and outsource the rest, keeping control where it matters and flexibility where it does not.
- Asset-light brands built on design, marketing or technology
- Markets where capable partners are available to hire
- A core team strong enough to manage contracts and quality
- Not where quality or secrecy must be tightly held in-house
Set up this structure in ZeniaHR
- Create departments for the core functions you employ, such as Product, Marketing, Core Operations, Finance and HR, and keep the list small and senior.
- Add designations for core roles like Vendor Manager, Brand Manager and Partner Coordinator, and use grades to hold pay bands for the lean team.
- Give every core employee a reporting manager and an HR partner, so leave and corrections route within the core then to HR.
- Keep partner and vendor staff out of the employee records, since they are not on your payroll, and track only your own people in the system.
- Use the org chart to keep the small core structure clean, and set a General or flexible shift for the core team.
- Keep leave, corrections and overtime on the reporting manager then HR route, and add core heads as reimbursement and hiring approvers.
See it on your own data
A 30-minute demo on a video call. We set up your departments, shifts and leave rules and show attendance, leave and payroll running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.
Book a free demoSee pricingFrequently asked questions
What is a network organizational structure?
A network organizational structure keeps a small core company and connects it to outside partners who do much of the work, such as manufacturing, logistics or marketing, linked by contracts rather than employment. The core owns the brand, product and customer, while core staff manage partners instead of doing the work. It suits lean, asset-light businesses that want flexibility.
What are the pros and cons of a network structure?
The pros are a lean, asset-light company that can scale or switch partners quickly and focus on what it does best. The cons are less control over partner quality, timelines and secrecy, and dependence on partners it does not employ. It fits design, marketing and technology-led brands, but not work where quality or secrecy must be tightly held in-house.
How is a network structure managed in an HRMS?
An HRMS tracks only the core employees the company actually employs, not partner or vendor staff, who are covered by contracts instead. Core employees get departments, reporting managers and an HR partner as usual, and leave and attendance follow the reporting manager then HR. Partners are managed outside the system through their agreements and quality checks.