Exceeds expectations
- Reads a dip in repeat orders as an early signal and shifts focus before it shows in the quarterly numbers.
- Connects the team's daily work to the year's weighted goals, so effort goes where it moves the plan.
- Weighs the second-order effect of a discount push, not just the immediate sales bump.
- Chose to build capacity ahead of the festival season rather than scrambling when demand arrived.
- Spots which two problems, solved, would clear most of the recurring firefighting, and starts there.
- Frames a proposal in terms of the branch's goals, so leadership sees why it matters, not just what it costs.
- Sees how a policy change in one department will ripple into two others and plans for it.
- Steps back from the daily rush regularly to check the team is still working on the right things.
Meets expectations
- Keeps the bigger goal in view rather than getting lost in daily tasks alone.
- Prioritises work that moves the plan over work that merely fills the day.
- Thinks a step ahead about what a decision will need next.
- Links own tasks to the team's goals when planning the week.
- Considers the likely knock-on effects before proposing a change.
- Plans for the busy season rather than reacting when it lands.
- Raises a longer-term risk in planning rather than only the immediate issue.
Needs improvement
- Focuses on today's tasks without checking they serve the larger goal.
- Reacts to each issue as it lands rather than seeing the pattern behind them.
- Proposes changes without weighing the knock-on effect on other teams.
- Optimises own area at the cost of the wider plan.
- Plans only to the next deadline, so the busy season always arrives as a surprise.
- Chases quick wins that do not move the bigger number.
- Struggles to explain how the daily work connects to the year's goals.
Self-review phrases
- I link my weekly work to the year's goals now, so effort goes where it matters.
- I built capacity ahead of the festival season rather than scrambling later.
- I want to weigh knock-on effects before proposing a change, not just the immediate gain.
- I step back weekly to check the team is working on the right things.
Tips for writing this feedback
- Judge strategic thinking by whether daily work connects to the bigger goal, not by grand statements in a meeting.
- Look for anticipation: planning for the busy season beats reacting to it, and it is easy to check afterwards.
- Value the person who sees second-order effects, since a quick win that hurts another team is not strategic.
- Set the expectation to the level; a junior applies it to their own tasks, a lead to the whole branch.
- Distinguish strategy from cleverness. The signal is choosing the right few things, not proposing the most ideas.
Track goals and review cycles for every employee in ZeniaHR.
See it on your own data
A 30-minute demo on a video call. We set up your departments, shifts and leave rules and show attendance, leave and payroll running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.
Book a free demoSee pricingFrequently asked questions
How do you evaluate strategic thinking in a review?
Evaluate it by whether the person connects daily work to the bigger goal, anticipates rather than reacts, and weighs the knock-on effects of a choice. Look for concrete signs: planning ahead of the busy season, focusing on the few problems that clear most firefighting, or framing a proposal around goals. Judge chosen priorities, not the number of ideas raised.
Can a junior employee show strategic thinking?
Yes, at their own scale. A junior shows it by linking their tasks to the team's goals, thinking a step ahead about what a decision will need, and flagging a longer-term risk rather than only the immediate issue. Set the expectation to the level: a junior applies it to their own work, while a lead applies it to the whole branch.
What is the difference between strategic thinking and planning?
Strategic thinking is choosing the right things to work on and seeing how they connect and ripple over time. Planning is organising the work to get those things done: sequence, resources and dates. A person can plan a task neatly yet aim at the wrong goal, or see the right priorities but struggle to organise the delivery. Rate them separately.