Home › HRMS › Industries › Construction and real estate › Performance and KRAs
Construction and real estate · Performance and KRAs

Performance and KRAs in construction and real estate

Performance in construction shows up in concrete: floors completed against schedule, snags closed, incidents avoided, agreements registered and flats handed over on time. The hard part is fairness, because an engineer on a site stalled by approvals cannot be judged like one on a site racing ahead. Good KRAs mix project outcomes with things the person controls, reviews follow project milestones as well as the calendar, and goals move with an engineer who transfers.

KRAs for site and project roles

Keep four or five weighted goals per role, and make at least one of them something the person fully controls. Weights matter: a junior engineer might carry 40 for schedule, 30 for quality, 20 for safety and 10 for site records, so one bad month on a delayed pour does not decide the year.

KRAs for sales and CRM teams

Sales KRAs look simple, bookings, but bookings that cancel or never register mislead. Weight registered agreements and collections above raw bookings, and add site visit conversion so the executive who turns walk-ins into second visits gets credit. CRM executives are measured on what buyers experience: demand letters sent on time, collections against the payment schedule, complaints closed, and possession handovers completed with snag lists cleared. Liaison officers can carry approvals obtained against target dates, with reasons recorded for any delay.

A review rhythm that follows the project

An annual review alone misses too much on a three-year project. Many developers run a quarterly cycle for site and sales staff, an annual cycle for head office, and a probation cycle for new joiners. Add an ad hoc cycle at major milestones, such as a tower's structure completion or handover, to capture the project manager's view while the work is fresh. When an engineer transfers mid-cycle, carry the goals to the new project and ask the old project manager for a short note before the move.

Where site reviews go wrong

Three mistakes repeat. Judging engineers only on schedule punishes whoever was given the hardest site. Letting one loud contractor complaint dominate the review ignores months of steady work. And reviewing sales staff on bookings alone rewards pushing buyers who later cancel. Discuss the weighted goals in a sit-down meeting, record ratings against the cycle, and use praise badges through the year so good site work is noticed long before review time.

How to set it up in ZeniaHR

  1. Create review cycles in Performance: quarterly for site and sales staff, annual for head office, and probation cycles for new joiners.
  2. Add goals for each employee typed as KRA or KPI, with weights that add up to 100 across schedule, quality, safety and records.
  3. At each project milestone, discuss the weighted goals with the engineer and keep the evidence, such as pour dates and inspection results, ready for the review meeting.
  4. Run an ad hoc cycle at structure completion or handover, and go through the cycle summary with each project manager.
  5. Ask project managers to give praise with badges such as Problem solver or Above and beyond when a site team delivers.

Read more about performance in ZeniaHR.

Roles this applies to

See performance and kras for construction and real estate in a demo

We set up your locations, shifts and rules on a video call and show it running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.

Book a free demoSee pricing

Frequently asked questions

What are the KRAs of a site engineer?

Common KRAs are progress against the slab or activity schedule, quality checks passed at first inspection, material wastage within limits, safety observations closed, and site records such as daily progress reports kept up to date. Weight them by what the engineer controls, and review them at least every quarter.

How do you measure real estate sales performance fairly?

Weight registered agreements and collections more heavily than raw bookings, because bookings can cancel. Add site visit conversion and follow-up quality, so the executive who builds a pipeline gets credit. Review quarterly and compare executives within the same project, since launch timing and pricing differ from project to project.

How often should construction companies review performance?

Quarterly reviews suit site and sales staff at most developers, because a project changes a lot in three months. Head office roles can stay annual. Add a review at major milestones, such as structure completion or handover, and a probation review for every new joiner.

How do you review an engineer who moved between projects?

Carry the goals with the engineer and get a short note from the previous project manager before the transfer. Weight the review by time spent on each project, so a strong six months on one site is not wiped out by a difficult first month on the next.