Exceeds expectations
- Traced repeated payroll mismatches to a wrong shift mapping and fixed the root cause, not just the month.
- When a supplier failed mid-order, lined up two alternates the same day and kept the line running.
- Broke a stubborn customer complaint into three parts and closed each, instead of arguing the whole.
- Found a workaround for the biometric outage so attendance kept flowing until the device was repaired.
- Cut a two-hour reconciliation to twenty minutes by spotting the duplicate entries at the source.
- Diagnosed why night dispatches kept slipping and re-sequenced loading, so the pattern stopped.
- Handled a double-booked hall by splitting timings and keeping both clients, rather than refunding one.
- Reads the actual error before escalating, so tickets reach IT with the cause already narrowed down.
Meets expectations
- Works through routine issues methodically and escalates only when a problem is truly beyond own scope.
- Checks the obvious causes first before assuming the worst, saving time on most tickets.
- Uses past cases and the SOP to solve recurring problems without fresh help each time.
- Gathers the facts, such as dates and amounts, before proposing a fix to the manager.
- Tries a sensible workaround when the usual route is blocked, then reports what was done.
- Asks the right clarifying questions before starting, so effort is not wasted on the wrong issue.
- Keeps a note of fixes that worked, so the same problem is faster to solve next time.
- Separates the urgent part of a problem from the rest and tackles that first.
Needs improvement
- Fixes the immediate symptom but rarely asks why the problem keeps returning each month.
- Escalates too early, before checking the manual or the obvious first causes.
- Jumps to a solution before the facts are in, so the fix sometimes misses the real issue.
- Waits for instructions when the usual route is blocked, rather than trying a safe workaround.
- Handles one part of a multi-part complaint and considers it closed, leaving the rest open.
- Repeats the same manual fix daily instead of raising the underlying process gap.
- Struggles to explain the problem clearly to IT, so tickets bounce back for more detail.
- Gets stuck when a case falls outside the SOP, and work stalls until someone steps in.
Self-review phrases
- I now ask why a problem recurred before closing it, not just fix the current instance.
- I check the SOP and past tickets before escalating, to save the team time.
- I want to gather the full facts before proposing a fix, so I stop guessing.
- I documented the recurring payroll fix so the next person solves it faster.
- I am learning to try a safe workaround when the normal route is blocked.
Tips for writing this feedback
- Reward root-cause fixes over quick patches. Ask whether the same problem came back, which tells you if it was truly solved.
- Look at how the person handles a case outside the SOP, where real problem solving shows more than routine tickets.
- Judge the method, not luck. A structured approach that fails once is more reliable than a guess that happened to work.
- Give a real example the person will recognise, naming the issue and the fix, so the feedback is concrete.
- Balance speed and thoroughness. Note whether fast fixes hold up or create rework later in the month.
Track goals and review cycles for every employee in ZeniaHR.
See it on your own data
A 30-minute demo on a video call. We set up your departments, shifts and leave rules and show attendance, leave and payroll running for your team. Free for your first 50 employees.
Book a free demoSee pricingFrequently asked questions
How do you assess problem-solving skills in a review?
Assess problem solving by looking at real cases the person handled: did they find the root cause or only patch the symptom, did the problem return, and how did they cope when the issue fell outside the standard procedure? Structured method and lasting fixes matter more than a single lucky save. Use specific examples in the feedback.
What is a sign of weak problem solving?
A common sign is fixing the same issue repeatedly without asking why it keeps coming back, so the manual patch becomes a daily task. Other signs are escalating before checking obvious causes, jumping to a solution before gathering facts, and stalling whenever a case falls outside the written procedure. Look for the pattern across the period.
Should I reward workarounds?
Reward safe, well-judged workarounds that keep work moving when the normal route is blocked, such as switching suppliers when one fails or handling attendance manually during a device outage. Do not reward workarounds that create risk or hide a problem that should be fixed properly. The test is whether the short-term fix helped without storing up trouble.